奥米盒子

Claude 3.5 SonnetVSDeepSeek V2.5

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Claude 3.5 Sonnet AI Model

阅读完整评测
VS
DeepSeek V2.5

DeepSeek V2.5

DeepSeek V2.5 AI Model

阅读完整评测

Select Your Role for Personalized Verdict

casual Verdict

Overall, [Claude](/lab?model=anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet) 3.5 Sonnet is the current industry leader (Elo: 1272). It generally provides more accurate and faster responses than [DeepSeek](/lab?model=deepseek/deepseek-chat) V2.5.
Data Verified from Authority Sources

Benchmarks including **LMSYS Chatbot Arena Elo** and **HumanEval Pass@1** are sourced from public leaderboards as of **2025/2026**. These metrics are indicative and may change as models are updated by providers.

LMSYS Leaderboard HumanEval Benchmark

Scores based on normalized benchmarks (0-100 scale)

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude 3.5 SonnetDeepSeek V2.5
ProviderAnthropicDeepSeek
Release Date2024-062024-09
Context Window200000128000
Pricing (Input)3 / per 1M tokens0.14 / per 1M tokens
Pricing (Output)15 / per 1M tokens0.28 / per 1M tokens
Pros
  • Superior coding and debugging capabilities (Artifacts UI)
  • More natural, human-like writing style
  • Massive 200k context window with perfect recall
  • Insanely cheap API pricing
  • Coding performance rivals Claude 3.5 Sonnet
  • Extremely efficient caching
Cons
  • Lacks native web search capability (uses tools)
  • Slightly slower than GPT-4o in short bursts
  • Weaker in creative writing and English nuance
  • Server stability can be variable

Methodology

We compared Claude 3.5 Sonnet and DeepSeek V2.5 based on real-world usage tests, official technical benchmarks, and community feedback. Our scoring system evaluates speed, reasoning capabilities (MMLU benchmarks), and coding proficiency.

Last updated: 1/17/2026